A part of the assessment of the
area earmarked for development at Lower Cosmeston Farm is a report
commissioned on behalf of the Welsh Assembly Government and prepared by
the Environmental Dimension Partnership Ltd (EDP/ Final
Draft/Archaeological and Heritage Assessment). This report sought to examine
the area’s potential for archaeological remains as well as to assess the character
of the historical standing architecture. The report details the results of a
geophysical survey, excavation work undertaken as well as an assessment of the
historical standing buildings of Lower Cosmeston Farm.
Because of the seemingly negative results of both surveys, this
field was not subject to any form of archaeological excavation. The
Glamorgan-Gwent Archaeological Trust, who were commissioned to conduct any
excavating work required, stated that there had been ‘sufficient investigation
of the site’ with no recommendation to proceed further with any form of
archaeological investigation.
(A view of the upper fields at Lower Cosmeston)
Having carefully read through the EDP report we feel that many of its
archaeological findings and its assessment of the historic buildings at Lower
Cosmeston Farm could be challenged. We considered the results of the
archaeological surveys in particular, which claim to have found no
archaeology at all, to be misleading. We therefore decided to undertake our
own archaeological survey in the form of a series of small trial trenches
within the vicinity of Lower Cosmeston farm. These trenches were dug in an area that we had
long suspected of containing medieval remains-an area that for some reason was
not encompassed within the geophysical survey. In the first instance we
encountered an abundance of medieval archaeology at a shallow depth.
The EDP report states that the field containing the recently
discovered medieval archaeology was subject to two different types of survey,
namely a magnetometry survey which was carried out by SUMO Geophysics, and an
'archaeological site walkover' undertaken by the Glamorgan Gwent Archaeological
Trust (GGAT).
The 'archaeological site walkover' claimed to have found no
evidence of archaeology or medieval activity whatsoever. The magnetometry
survey results also failed to expose the presence of any archaeology within the
near vicinity of Lower Cosmeston farm.
(A ceramic sherd from one of the trenches)
What we have
discovered however within the two trial trenches are almost certainly archaeological remains of medieval date. We uncovered hundreds of pottery shreds and various
other small finds from this area indicative of a midden. Given the close proximity of these
archaeological remains to the medieval village of Cosmeston, there is
undoubtedly a connection. Hence, this newly discovered medieval archaeology has
the capacity to transform our understanding of not only the evolution of
Cosmeston as a settlement, but to also elicit more information about the lives
of some of Penarth's earliest inhabitants.
(Detail of
archaeological remains which likely represent part of a rubble filled wall
course uncovered at Lower Cosmeston Farm)
Due
however to the limited size of the excavations we cannot presently state the
exact nature of the remains, and the conclusions that we can draw from them are
at this time limited. The goal of our excavation however was only intended to
highlight the flawed findings of the EDP report and to show what it had missed
rather than to undertake a full and comprehensive excavation.
What we
would like to see are these important archaeological remains granted legal
protection as a Scheduled Ancient Monument. A local precedent relating to the
same type of archaeological remains can be found at the nearby deserted
medieval village of Cogan (ST16977052) which is afforded legal protection by
CADW as a Scheduled Ancient Monument.
We
cannot do better than to quote CADW's reasons for listing the archaeology of
Cogan medieval village:
'The monument is of national importance
for its potential to enhance our knowledge of medieval settlement. The monument
forms an important element within the wider medieval context and the scheduled
area many be expected to contain a wide range of archaeological information,
including chronological detail and evidence in regard to construction
techniques and agricultural methods'.
This
Scheduling criteria should logically also apply to the medieval archaeology at
Lower Cosmeston Farm.
In regard to the historic buildings of Lower
Cosmeston Farm, the EDP report detailed an assessment of the near four hundred
year old ‘end-entry’ historic farm house, which is at present one of the oldest
standing buildings in Penarth. It is one of the only original 'in-situ' standing
structures remaining from the post-medieval hamlet of Cosmeston. This building,
which was considered interesting and important enough to be mentioned in the Royal Commission
on Ancient and Historic Monuments of Wales (RCAHMW) 1988 publication, ‘Farmhouses and Cottages, Vol 4
part 2’, was dismissed as being of
‘limited heritage
significance’ and, ‘not recommended for retention
or conservation’. The late
Georgian period farm buildings, which to use CADW’s nomenclature, exhibit ‘group value’, were also dismissed in the EDP report.
(View facing Lower
Cosmeston Farm)
The
report took no account of the structure’s wider significance within the
historic environment of Cosmeston and as such its place in the modern community
as a great, albeit relatively unknown survivor from this post-medieval period
of Cosmeston’s history. If Lower Cosmeston Farm and its outbuildings however
happened to be located within a conservation area elsewhere else within the
Vale of Glamorgan such as Llamnaes, Llandow, Llantwit Major, Cowbridge,
Llysworney et al, they would in all likelihood have received statutory
protection because of their age, 'group value', contribution the historic
environment and the character of the area.
A perplexing aspect to the EDP assessment of Lower Cosmeston Farm
was that it was carried out without involvement from CADW, whom given the
primary purpose of their existence is to, 'champion the appreciation, protection and conservation of
the historic environment of Wales', seems odd.
Despite repeated efforts by ourselves, a local Councillor who is working with
us and a journalist, CADW have chosen not to respond. The authors of the
EDP/ Final Draft/Archaeological and Heritage Assessment themselves also state
that despite attempts to contact CADW they would not respond to
them.
Also just as
perplexing is that despite contacting two other Welsh heritage bodies, namely
the Glamorgan Gwent Archaeological Trust and Royal Commission on Ancient and
Historical Monuments Wales, and imploring them to get involved by coming to
view the archaeology, intercede in the planning process or to just simply
lend us their voice, none have chosen to do so. This also very disappointing considering that their primary roles are
to help protect and promote the heritage assets of Wales.
(Cosmeston
medieval village)
The
medieval village of Cosmeston and its surrounding archaeologically rich
landscape is regarded by everyone within the archaeological/heritage fraternity
as an important place. A testament to Cosmeston's importance is that no less
than three different archaeological groups, the most recent of which was
Cardiff University whom from 2008-2011 spent tens of, if not hundreds of
thousands of pounds undertaking archaeological excavations within its environs.
Lower Cosmeston Farm and the recently discovered medieval archaeology are a
part of this important archaeological site.
Cosmeston
medieval village is regarded as a special place by many people from the local
community who come to both muse upon our shared past and to appreciate the
early origins of our community. Lower Cosmeston Farm and its surrounding fields
lends itself to the peaceful tranquillity and ambience that Cosmeston affords.
This ambience would be compromised if the destruction of Lower Cosmeston Farm
were to be allowed to proceed. A huge increase in traffic and congestion at all
times of the day, noise pollution, exhaust fumes and increased environmental
pollution are always the invariable result of such developments-as well as
visitors having to look at an incongruous eyesore on the near-horizon which
would overshadow and despoil the rural character of Cosmeston.
(Lower Cosmeston
Farm)
We
invite anyone from any of the main heritage bodies of Wales, namely CADW,
RCAHMW and GGAT to get in touch with us and come and view the newly discovered
archaeology for themselves as well as the historical standing
architecture.
We also
feel that this would be an opportune moment to consider ascribing the area
encompassing the medieval village of Cosmeston along with Lower Cosmeston
Farm, its buildings, archaeology and the surrounding fields status as a
Conservation Area or A Site of Special Scientific Interest (ASSI) to help
preserve, protect and enhance this historical, archaeological and not to
mention biologically diverse natural habitat and ecosystem which helps to form
a vial 'green lung' for Penarth and its surrounding area, from the threat of
destruction.
©Jonathan
and Mark Lambert 2020
The right of Jonathan and
Mark Lambert to be identified as Authors of this work has been asserted in
accordance with the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights
reserved. No part of this article may be reprinted, reproduced or utilised in
any form or by any electronic means, including social media, or mechanical, or
by any other means including photocopying and recording, or in any information
storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the authors.
No comments
Post a Comment